Duct Sizing Chart by CFM

Updated September 2026

Most duct sizing charts you'll find online are copied from a paper ductulator and only cover one friction rate, buried in a PDF you have to squint at. This page shows the same math the calculator runs, laid out as a table, at the standard residential friction rate of 0.1 in.wg per 100 ft — so you can scan straight to your airflow instead of typing it in, or use it to sanity-check a number the calculator gave you.

Duct size by CFM (round, galvanized, 0.1 in.wg/100 ft)

Each row solves the equal-friction equation FR = 0.109136 × Q1.9 / d5.02 for the given CFM, then rounds up to the nearest standard duct size and recomputes the actual velocity and friction rate for that size — exactly what the calculator does, just precomputed for common airflows.

CFMRound ductVelocity (fpm)Actual friction
505"3670.057
1006"5090.085
1507"5610.085
2008"5730.075
2509"5660.064
3009"6790.090
35010"6420.071
40010"7330.092
45012"5730.046
50012"6360.056
60012"7640.079
70014"6550.049
80014"7480.063
90014"8420.079
100014"9350.096
120016"8590.070
140016"10020.094
160018"9050.067
180018"10180.083
200020"9160.060

All values: galvanized round duct, equal-friction method targeting 0.1 in.wg/100 ft, rounded up to the nearest standard size. For an exact CFM not listed here, or a different friction rate, use the calculator directly.

Why the friction rate doesn't stay constant down the table

Notice the "actual friction" column bounces around 0.05–0.10 rather than sitting exactly at 0.1 — that's expected, not an error. Because duct sizes only come in fixed increments, the exact diameter the friction equation solves for almost never lands on a stocked size. Rounding up to the next standard size means the duct is very slightly larger than strictly required, which pulls the actual friction rate (and velocity) down a bit below the 0.1 target. A CFM that lands just above a size break (like 400 CFM rounding up from 9.8" to a full 10") shows a friction rate close to target; one that lands just below a size break (like 450 CFM rounding up from 10.3" all the way to 12") shows a noticeably lower actual friction rate, because the jump to the next stocked size was a bigger step.

Using a different friction rate

0.1 in.wg/100 ft is the common default for residential and light-commercial branch runs, but tighter mechanical spaces sometimes use a higher target (up to around 0.15–0.2) to keep duct sizes smaller, accepting more noise and static pressure in trade. A chart at a different friction rate would shift every row — smaller ducts at higher friction rates, larger at lower ones — which is exactly why a single static chart can only cover one scenario well. The calculator lets you set any friction rate and reflects the change immediately, including the velocity and rectangular-equivalent sizes for that specific target.

Reading this chart alongside a load calculation

The CFM values here are inputs, not something this chart derives — they should come from a Manual J load calculation (whole-house or room-by-room) or the rated airflow of your equipment, not guessed. A rough field rule of thumb used for a quick trunk estimate is about 400 CFM per ton of cooling capacity — a 3-ton system works out to roughly 1,200 CFM, sizing to a 16" trunk in the table above.

FAQs

Why is my exact CFM not in the table? The table covers common round-number airflows for quick reference. For an exact CFM, use the calculator — it solves the same formula for any value rather than the nearest table row.

Does this chart apply to flex duct? No — it's based on smooth galvanized sheet metal, the standard friction reference. Flex duct has meaningfully higher friction per foot (commonly 3–8× depending on installation) — size up one increment from these figures for a flex run.

What about rectangular duct sizes for these CFMs? See the round-to-rectangular conversion page — every round size in this table has an equivalent rectangular table there.

Is this the same as a "ductulator"? Functionally yes — a ductulator is a circular slide-rule tool built around this same friction equation. This table and the calculator solve the equation algebraically instead of reading it off a printed wheel, so the results should match a correctly-used ductulator for the same friction rate and material.

→ Size your duct now (free)